AI lead generator + intake · For law firms

Every new client conversation,
qualified and ready for your lawyer's first meeting.

PROVEAiBLE replaces your contact form with a conversational AI that interviews every new lead — with documents or just a conversation — redacts personal information on their device before any AI sees it, verifies any cited statutes against your firm's law vault, and delivers a structured matter file to your inbox before the first call.

Apply for Round 1 demo See it work
PII never reaches the LLM Statutes verified to source BYOK · AI tokens never marked up
Watch it work

See what your firm receives
before the first call.

One client. One conversation. Three minutes of intake. Scroll to watch the AI listen, ask, narrow down, and prepare a structured matter file your firm can act on.

01 · Verify

Email-verified before the AI runs.

Six-digit code. No password. Bots never reach the chat.

02 · Listen

The AI hears it once, in their words.

Plain conversation. The client tells the story to a human-sounding assistant, not a form.

03 · Request

It asks for the exact document that matters.

Specific to what the client just said. No generic upload form.

04 · Read

The file is read before the AI sees the text.

OCR and structure parsing run first. Then the client decides what stays out.

05 · Choose

Client picks what stays hidden.

Names, addresses, identifiers — opt-in redaction before any LLM call.

06 · Redact locally

Sensitive details never leave the device.

The protected version is what the model sees. The original stays under the client's control.

07 · Quote & verify

It quotes the document back to the client.

Specific. From the file. Not a checklist.

08 · Build the chain

Each answer informs the next question.

Mentioned formal letters? It asks if you kept copies. It's interviewing, not surveying.

09 · Fill the gap

Asks the client what the document didn't say.

What's missing from the file is what the AI asks about next. No blank spaces left for your meeting.

10 · Handoff

Facts. Timing. Sources stamped.

Structured matter file with timing concerns flagged and an audit trail on every claim — sourced back to the client's words and uploaded documents.

Hartley & Associates
Legal intake
Powered by PROVEAiBLE Secure intake
For your firm

Spam blocked at the door.

Only verified clients reach the AI. Bots and fake leads can't drain your tokens or your time.

For your firm

Skip the first 20 minutes.

No more reconstructing the story on the call. The full account arrives written and timestamped.

For your firm

No more "can you forward me the letter?"

The exact document arrives with the matter. Three back-and-forth emails per intake just disappeared.

For your firm

The compliance question answered itself.

Client PII never reaches the LLM. You don't need a new policy — the architecture IS the policy.

For your firm

Consent on the record.

If you ever receive the original, it's because the client said send it. Clean audit trail, no ambiguity.

For your firm

"I can't send client data to AI" — answered.

The strongest objection from cautious lawyers, neutralised by architecture.

For your firm

A paralegal's questions, not a checklist.

This is the difference between an intake form and an intake interview.

For your firm

Decide before you commit.

By the third question you can already tell if this is worth your time. Filter at the top of the funnel.

For your firm

You walk in with the gaps named.

What the client didn't send is in the file. What they couldn't answer is in the file.

For your firm

Open the file. Every fact has a source.

Statutes researched and cited. Timing concerns flagged. Every claim auditable in JSON. First meeting is for judgment.

Lawyer-ready output

What lands in your inbox.

No JSON. No raw transcript. A structured matter file your team can read in 60 seconds and act on. Every fact has a source. Every gap is named.

From PROVEAiBLE · delivered to intake@hartleylaw.com
Generated30 April 2026, 11:42 GMT
ClientJames Carter · verified
IssueWrongful termination · Employment
Anchor docTermination_Letter.pdf
Ready for first-call review.

Overview

Client (38) was terminated from Northbridge Logistics on 18 March 2026, citing review of conduct relating to internal complaints handling protocols. Client states he raised written complaints about the same protocols in November 2025 and February 2026, both with HR delivery receipts retained. Final meeting held 12 March; written notice issued 14 March. No Right to Sue letter received.

Open issues 2

  • Cited reason for termination is internal-protocol review, but client describes complaints raised about that very process. Probe potential retaliation framing under Title VII and state law.
  • Schedule A (severance terms) referenced in the termination letter but not provided. Confirm whether the severance offer pre- or post-dates the written notice.

Timing concerns 1

  • ⚑ 4-day gap flagged Final meeting 12 March → written notice 14 March → effective 18 March. Short window from meeting to formal notice may bear on predetermined intent. Filing window starts from date of written notice.

Suggested questions to probe with the client 4

  • "Can you produce both written complaints (Nov 2025 + Feb 2026) plus the HR delivery receipts before our first meeting?"
  • "Was the Schedule A severance offer presented at the 12 March meeting, after the written notice, or never seen?"
  • "Have you taken any step toward filing with the EEOC or state labor board, or only considered it?"
  • "Did the cited 'review of conduct' process involve formal disciplinary steps with documentation, or was it informal?"

Documents reviewed 1

  • Termination_Letter.pdf — uploaded · anchor document · 7 pagesNorthbridge Logistics, HR Operations

Documents not yet provided 2

  • Schedule A — severance terms (referenced in termination letter, not yet provided)
  • Original email thread of client's written complaints to HR (client confirms held)

Applicable laws 3

  • 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3 · Title VII (retaliation)law.cornell.edu
  • 29 U.S.C. § 215 · FLSA retaliationdol.gov
  • Mass. G.L. c.151B § 4(4) · State anti-retaliationmalegislature.gov

Recommended first action

Review the open factual issues and document availability notes — confirm with the client that both complaint letters with HR delivery receipts can be produced before the first call. Schedule A timing is the cleanest probe of retaliation framing.

Hidden from AI 5

  • 5 redaction terms applied at the client's choice (client name, home address, phone, employer reference number). The LLM only ever saw the protected version. Original document available on the firm's request.

Files in this matter 6

lawyer_handoff.md · this summary Termination_Letter.pdf · redacted source Termination_Letter__highlighted.pdf · key quotes annotated dossier.json · structured data case-data.json · full audit trail chat_transcript.txt · verbatim chat
Termination_Letter__highlighted.pdf 4 key quotes highlighted 5 PII fields hidden

NOTICE OF TERMINATION

Issued 14 March 2026 · Reference HR-2026-0187

To: James Carter

Address: 418 Wellesley Drive, Apt 7B, Boston MA 02115

Phone: +1 617 555 0124

Dear Mr Carter,

This letter confirms that your employment with Northbridge Logistics Inc. is terminated effective 18 March 2026. As discussed in our meeting on 12 March 2026, the decision follows a review of conduct relating to internal complaints handling protocols.

Your final paycheck, accrued vacation balance, and severance offer (as detailed in the attached Schedule A) will be processed on the next standard payroll cycle. Continuation of group health coverage under COBRA is available; election forms will be sent under separate cover.

Company property — including the issued laptop, access badge, and any printed materials — must be returned to the HR office by close of business on 20 March 2026.

Sincerely,
Rachel Levin, Director of People Operations
Northbridge Logistics Inc.
Page 1 of 7
Why this isn't another contact form

A lead generator that interviews,
audits, and grounds every claim.

Generic AI chatbots summarise. Contact forms collect names. PROVEAiBLE delivers a qualified matter file. These are the differences your firm will feel from the first lead.

It's a lead generator. The intake is just done.

Most "intake forms" capture name + email + matter type and stop. PROVEAiBLE replaces your contact form with an AI that interviews every prospect — with documents or just a conversation — qualifies the lead, redacts PII on their device, and delivers a structured matter file before your first call. Every email arrival is already triaged. Your inbox becomes a qualified-lead pipeline.

Old contact form
Name. Email. Matter type. Someone will be in touch.
→
PROVEAiBLE matter file
Facts · Timeline · Cited statutes verified · Missing evidence flagged · Redacted PDFs · Pre-meeting checklist

Quotes the document back to the client.

The AI reads the upload, finds the load-bearing facts, and asks about them by name.

indictment.pdf
→
"On 12 March 2021, did you push first, or were you responding to her aggression?"
It's the difference between a junior paralegal and a Google form.

When two documents disagree, the AI asks the client.

Inconsistencies are surfaced mid-intake while they can still be tested against the client's own account.

police_report.pdf
≠
indictment.pdf
"The police report calls you the 'complaining party.' The indictment names you as defendant. Which is correct?"

Click any cited law and read it.

The AI doesn't make up case law. Every statute it cites links to the official source. Verify in seconds.

AI cited this statute
8 CFR § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)
View on uscis.gov Verified

The client can ask the AI back.

Mid-intake side questions get real answers — without losing the planner.

…could you upload your latest pay stub?
I have the termination letter and your timeline. Adding the pay stub helps the wage-loss claim.

Your firm's law library writes itself.

Every new case adds the statutes the AI couldn't already cite. Your library compounds.

ProveAIble_Laws/
8_CFR_214.2.pdf
Title_VII_42USC.pdf
MGL_c151B.pdf
+ 3 added this month

Procedural timing checked automatically.

Long gaps, overlapping dates, statutory deadlines approaching — flagged in the handoff before you read it.

12 Mar
14 Mar
⚑ 4-day gap filing window
18 Mar
22 Mar

Every fact comes with a source.

Open the matter file. Each claim shows exactly which document, page, and line it came from. No black box. No "trust the AI."

"Employment terminated effective 18 March 2026"
termination_letter.pdf · page 1
"Client raised complaints in writing — November + February"
client interview · question 1
"No Right to Sue letter received yet"
client interview · question 3

What the client didn't send is in the file.

Documents that should support a claim but aren't there get flagged. You walk in with the gaps named — not surprised on the call.

Termination letter
Email thread to HR
Disciplinary record
Schedule A — severance terms
12-month performance review
The single biggest claim on this page

PII is redacted before
the AI ever sees the document.

Every other AI intake tool sends the client's full document to the model and hopes for the best. We don't. The client redacts on their device first — and only the protected version reaches the LLM.

Live · watch the redaction happen
Scroll into view to play

NOTICE OF TERMINATION

Issued 14 March 2026 · Reference HR-2026-0187

To: James Carter

Address: 418 Wellesley Drive, Apt 7B, Boston MA 02115

Phone: +1 617 555 0124

Dear Mr Carter,

This letter confirms that your employment with Northbridge Logistics Inc. is terminated effective 18 March 2026. As discussed in our meeting on 12 March 2026, the decision follows a review of conduct relating to internal complaints handling protocols.

Your final paycheck, accrued vacation balance, and severance offer (as detailed in the attached Schedule A) will be processed on the next standard payroll cycle. Continuation of group health coverage under COBRA is available; election forms will be sent under separate cover.

Sincerely,
Rachel Levin, Director of People Operations
Northbridge Logistics Inc.

"I can't send client data to an LLM."

The number-one objection from cautious lawyers, neutralised at the architecture level. Show this to your senior partner. Show it to your data-protection officer. The page speaks for itself.

Wherever clients find you

No website? No problem.

A solo lawyer with no firm site still gets structured intake. Drop the widget on a website, share a direct link, print a QR, or hyperlink it from your email signature. Same intake, four ways in.

HA How can I help today?

Embed on your site

Launch ready

One <script> tag. Themed to your firm. Works on every site builder.

intake.proveaible.com/hartley
Hartley & Associates
Hi James, let's get verified.
Hello
Tell me what's happened.

Direct shareable link

Launch ready

Send the URL via SMS, email, or messenger. Opens straight to your firm's intake. No site required.

→

QR code

Launch ready

Print on a poster, business card, or shopfront. One tap from a phone camera and the client's in.

From: Sarah Chen

Thanks for reaching out — I'll be in touch tomorrow.

Best,

Sarah Chen Family Law · Hartley & Associates Talk to our 24/7 intake assistant

Email signature

Launch ready

"Got a matter? Talk to our intake assistant" + the link. Every email becomes an intake channel.

Final testing · Building with founding firms

We're in final testing.
Round 1 founding firms shape what ships next.

Founding members tell us what their practice needs — we build it before public launch. The two items below are already in active build. Beyond these, your firm's specific requirements get prioritised. No version-upgrade fees, ever.

In active build

AI legal researcher with verified citations

Every cited statute fetched from your firm's law vault, verified against the actual text, returned as "verified" or "lawyer please confirm." Per-jurisdiction vaults built during onboarding (1-2 days each).

Roadmap · founding members prioritise

Multi-language intake

English-only at launch. Founding firms tell us which language their client mix needs — backend production-tests each, then we add it. One language at a time, properly verified.

English· Español· 中文· العربية· हिन्दी· Português· Français· Deutsch· Русский· 日本語· 한국어· Türkçe· Tiếng Việt· Italiano· Polski· Bahasa· English· Español· 中文· العربية· हिन्दी· Português· Français· Deutsch· Русский· 日本語· 한국어· Türkçe· Tiếng Việt· Italiano· Polski· Bahasa
Founding firms shape this

Your custom features, on the house.

Whatever your practice needs that we haven't built yet — tell us during install. If it fits the architecture, we build it before your firm goes live. Every founding firm so far has shipped with at least one custom feature. No fees, no upgrade tiers, ever.

AA
Built by a founder, not a stack

"AI shouldn't replace lawyers. It should hand them a file that's already half done."

I'm Andrew Aitken — Australian. I've been the client more than once, and in more than one of those matters I prepared the case file for my own lawyer before walking in. Multiple lawyers told me they'd never had a client come in that prepared, and that the work I'd brought them changed how they ran the matter.

I built that work using AI as a paralegal. Not the kind that replaces lawyers — the kind that gives a stressed client a calmer way to tell what happened, and gives a lawyer a structured file before the first call. Used right, AI doesn't take work away from a firm. It hands the firm work that's already half done.

PROVEAiBLE exists for one reason: so the first meeting is about strategy, not data entry. Every install I do personally. If something breaks, you talk to me — not a ticket queue.

Talk to me directly
Install in days, not weeks

~1 hour of your time. Live within a week.

No portal to learn. No team training. No infrastructure project. We do the configuration; you do two short calls.

1

Book a demo

Five-minute form in the chat. Tells us your firm size, country, and current intake pain.

5 min
2

30-min demo call

Andrew walks you through the product. You share your practice areas and what your handoff should look like.

30 min
3

We configure

Branding, embed code, intake routing, practice-area question prompts — done in the background.

You: 0 min
4

30-min go-live

Walkthrough of your live widget. Embed code on your site (we install if you give access). You're live.

30 min
5

First 30 days

Andrew personally reviews your first 10–20 handoffs and tunes the AI for your firm's voice.

Async
~1 hour of your time · Live within 2–7 business days

Everything else runs in the background. You stay focused on your matters.

Founder-led install · Built for small firms

From €99 per lawyer / month.
BYOK AI tokens. Never marked up.

Built for solo and small firms (1-5 lawyers) that need a lead generator with intake intelligence. Larger firms — contact us for custom pricing. You bring your own Anthropic, OpenAI, or OpenRouter key. Token costs go directly to your provider, never through us.

What setup includes

  • White-label widget on your site (your colours, logo, name)
  • Per-jurisdiction law vault built (3 included for founding · 1 for standard · €499 each additional)
  • Webhook integration with your intake email or CRM
  • Lawyer roster routing (multi-lawyer firms)
  • Intake question tuning for your verticals
  • Pre-launch consultation + walkthrough
  • 30 days of post-launch founder support
Setup From €1,999 · one-time, non-refundable
Monthly From €99 per licensed lawyer / month
AI tokens BYOK · never marked up

Per licensed lawyer only. Paralegals, legal assistants, admin, intake staff, and any other firm staff who need access — included free.

30-day money-back guarantee on the first month's subscription. 15% off when paid annually. Custom pricing for 4+ lawyer firms — contact us.

All prices exclude VAT and applicable local taxes. AI token usage billed directly by your provider.

Round 1 founding offer · 10 spots

€1,999 €999 setup

€99 per lawyer / month · Locked for the lifetime of your subscription · 3 jurisdictions included · Limited spots

Lifetime rate lock applies for as long as your subscription remains continuously active. After Round 1 closes, standard pricing starts from €1,999 setup + €199/lawyer/month.

Apply for a Round 1 spot