Sample case report

Read it like your lawyer would.

One example of what PROVEAiBLE Desktop produces from your evidence, your timeline, and the documents you upload. Reports are fully customisable — you decide what your case calls for. Below is one possible output: a custody-variation matter, printable and audit-ready.

PROVEAiBLE · Your matter
Personal brief · Confidential

Custody variation — supervised access breach

Generated
17 May 2026, 14:22 (local)
Prepared by
[CLIENT] — via PROVEAiBLE Desktop
Jurisdiction
Family Court of Australia (NSW registry)
Matter
Variation of parenting orders · supervised-access breach
Time-sensitive   School welfare concern raised by teacher on 22 April. Your application for urgent variation is dated; bring this to the first meeting.

What you're seeking

Goal: Vary the existing parenting orders to remove supervision and increase weekday time.

Need from the lawyer: Strategic advice on whether to pursue interim orders before the substantive hearing.

Desired outcome: Equal-time arrangement with primary care during school weeks.

Procedural posture

  • Original orders made 12 March 2024; no subsequent applications filed.
  • Next hearing: none currently listed.
  • Statute of limitations: no statutory bar for variation; recency of grounds will affect weight.

Documents on file 3

Court Order — 12 March 2024
Original consent orders. Supervised access weekends only; primary care with the other parent.
  • Section 65DAA considered — equal time deemed not in child's best interest at the time.
  • Supervision through approved family-services provider.
School report — Term 1, 2025
Child welfare update from primary teacher dated 22 April. Flags two missed days and behavioural changes.
Email correspondence — Feb to Apr 2025
11 messages between [CLIENT] and [OTHER_PARTY]. Includes scheduling, child-handover logistics, two disputes about pickup times.

Documents to bring to the first meeting 2

School incident log High priority
Referenced in teacher's 22 April email but you don't yet have a copy.
Action: request directly from the school office before the first meeting.
"The teacher mentioned it on the phone but I don't have a copy."
Recent communication with the supervised-access provider
You have these — bring them. They establish current compliance baseline.

Disputed facts 1

Frequency of contact with the other parent
Your account: "They never respond to me."
Email log shows: 11 replies over 60 days, average response time ~6 hours.

Inconsistencies in your account 1

Stated "no contact for weeks" — email log shows continuous exchange.
Conflicts with: Email correspondence, Feb–Apr 2025.

Best to clarify with your lawyer whether you meant a specific period or were describing general perception. Be ready for this to come up — the other side will see the same emails.

Laws cited in your documents

  • Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s.65DAA — equal time / substantial and significant time considerations.
  • Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s.60CC — best-interests-of-the-child factors. Relevant to recasting current orders.

Citations extracted from your uploaded documents. Your lawyer verifies each against the current statute.

Timeline

12 Mar 2024
Original consent orders issued (supervised access, weekends only).
Source: Court Order — 12 March 2024
08 Jan 2025
First breach of supervised-access arrangement.
Source: Your statement
22 Apr 2025
Email from teacher flagging child welfare concern.
Source: School report — Term 1, 2025
03 May 2025
You request urgent variation of orders.
Source: Personal note

Pre-meeting checklist

  1. Bring the original court order, school report, and email log printed or on a tablet.
  2. Request the school's full incident log (referenced in teacher's 22 April email but not attached).
  3. Be ready to walk your lawyer through the 11 emails — specifically the response patterns.
  4. Confirm where the child currently spends school nights.
  5. Ask whether interim orders are worth pursuing before the substantive hearing.

PROVEAiBLE assembles facts and surfaces gaps. It does not give legal advice. Every recommendation in this file is decision support — bring it to a qualified lawyer who will decide what to act on and how.

PROVEAiBLE · Case preparation, done right.
proveaible.com
Your own matter file

Yours doesn't have to look any different.

Drop your documents into PROVEAiBLE Desktop. The app reads them locally on your computer, builds your timeline, flags contradictions, organises everything — and produces a brief like this one for your lawyer. Founding members lock pre-launch pricing for life.

Get the app

PROVEAiBLE does not provide legal advice. This sample case package illustrates what the app produces from your evidence. It does not predict outcomes or replace a qualified lawyer. Always consult a lawyer for legal advice.