01 — Evidence
Get everything in one place.
Upload anything — PDFs, photos, scanned letters, screenshots, audio. AI reads it all and organises it automatically.
Upload anything
PDFs, photos, scans, audio, emails. AI vision reads handwritten notes. Every document dated and organised automatically.
Versions & second opinions
Re-analyse any document with a different model or run a second opinion when it matters. Every version saved, so you can compare them side by side.
Names blacked out before any AI sees them.
Names, addresses, children, witnesses, IDs — detected on your computer with roles assigned. You see what's about to be redacted; approve, skip, or rename in one click. Decisions stick across every document.
FAMILY COURT — CIVIL DIVISION
In the Matter of a Proceeding for Custody between Petitioner James Carter, represented by Mr Hartley, and Respondent Emma Whitfield, represented by Ms Bennett, concerning the minor child Sophie Whitfield.
The parties reside at 142 Maple Avenue, Springfield. Communications should be directed to emma.whitfield@example.com.
Witness statement on file from David Park, dated 7 May 2024.
Court file ID NN-12345-25-A.
Detected items
9 found · 10-role taxonomy · pencil = change role, eye-slash = skip, trash = delete
memory Remember these for future documents
Saves detected names, emails, and IDs to your Privacy Profile so the next upload is redacted automatically. Manage profile →
The sentences that matter — surfaced and sourced.
The AI reads what's left and highlights every key sentence on the page — court decisions, facts in your favour, warnings, action items. Every quote tagged back to its source page.
PAGE 19 — CONCLUSION AND ORDER
The Court acknowledges that the Petitioner is a caring and involved father whose commitment to his daughter's life is not in question, but finds that continuity of care and the primacy of the Respondent's longstanding caretaking role weigh in favour of the existing arrangement.
Primary custody is hereby awarded to the Respondent, with the Petitioner entitled to parenting time on alternate weekends from Friday 6:00 p.m. to Sunday 6:00 p.m., and every Wednesday evening from 5:00 to 7:30 p.m.
The Court notes that the Petitioner's pattern of conduct during the proceedings raises questions about his capacity to co-parent cooperatively.
The Petitioner is directed to complete a parenting assessment programme within ninety days of this Order.
Key Quotes
0"...caring and involved father whose commitment to his daughter's life is not in question..."
"Primary custody is hereby awarded to the Respondent, with the Petitioner entitled to parenting time on alternate weekends..."
"...pattern of conduct during the proceedings raises questions about his capacity to co-parent cooperatively."
"Petitioner is directed to complete a parenting assessment programme within ninety days of this Order."