PROVEAiBLE doesn’t just chat with your client — it reads everything they upload. Police reports, records, contracts, screenshots: OCR’d, read, redacted, then assembled into one structured case file your practitioner opens — a recommendation with a case-strength score, the facts and a timeline, contradictions flagged across the documents, plus a plain-language client summary and every redacted source.
They upload the police report, the medical record, the messages. PROVEAiBLE takes the conversation and the documents together — a pile most intake forms would only ask them to attach and forget.
Every file — even a photo of a form — is OCR’d to text and cross-checked. Names, IDs and reference numbers become role tags before the case-analysis model sees them.
A recommendation with a case-strength score, the facts and a timeline, contradictions flagged across the documents — plus a plain-language client summary and every redacted source.
“He took the kids after the hearing and never brought them back.”
Police report — text extracted. [CLIENT] reported that [OTHER PARTY] removed two minors on . Ref .
Custody order — [CLIENT] granted primary care; handover every .
Every document is OCR’d to text, then identifiers become role tags before the case-analysis model reads a word.
The chat and every file they upload.
OCR’d, cross-checked, identifiers tagged.
Scored, timelined, contradictions flagged.
A client rarely arrives with their story in order. It’s scattered across a conversation and a stack of documents they’ve been carrying for months. PROVEAiBLE turns that into a case file a lawyer can act on at the first meeting — nothing lost, nothing they had to sort out themselves.
they upload is read, not just filed — the report, the record, the screenshots become part of the case, not an attachment nobody opens.
What we changedrequests to US legal-aid programs are turned away for lack of capacity — many because no one could size up the matter fast enough.2
Legal Services Corporation, USto fill in wrong. They say what happened and hand over what they have — the structuring is done for them.
The intake, off their shouldersthey walk in and the work is already done — read, ordered and summarised, so the time is spent on their case, not on catching up.
The gap PROVEAiBLE closesAbout two-thirds of humanity have a justice need that goes unmet. The help often exists — what stands in the way is being seen clearly and quickly at first contact.1
World Justice ProjectTheir documents are read. Not just attached and forgotten — every file becomes part of the matter.
Nothing to organise. No labelling, no ordering, no summary to write — that work is off their shoulders.
Nothing lost. The story and the evidence reach the practitioner intact — ready to act on at meeting one.
A generic bot hands back a transcript. PROVEAiBLE hands back your case file — the sections your practitioners open to, in your headings, scored the way you decide a matter is worth taking. You choose what’s inside it.
Recommendation, facts, timeline, contradictions, red flags, client summary, redacted sources — switch on the sections your practitioners actually open to.
The matter details your team works from, labelled in your terminology — so the file reads like your file, not a form someone else designed.
The case-strength score tuned to how you decide a matter is worth taking — your thresholds, your priorities, your decline criteria. A group across several offices gets one file that adapts to each.
Configured hands-on at onboarding. White-glove — we tune what the file contains and how it scores to your practice before a single client uses it.
That’s the difference between a file that reads like your firm’s and a chatbot transcript anyone could print.
The average lawyer turns only three of every eight working hours into billable time — much of the rest goes to admin like reading and writing up intake. A file that arrives already read and summarised gives those hours back: a firm reclaims billable time; a centre serves more people without adding admin staff.
Source: Clio Legal Trends, US benchmark3Because it reads every document and cross-checks them against the conversation and each other, contradictions and red flags surface before anyone sits down. When demand outstrips capacity — Australian community legal centres turned away 368,000 people in 2022–23, about 1,000 a day — a matter you can read in seconds is a matter you can act on instead of turning away.
Source: Community Legal Centres Australia4Yes. Clients can upload police reports, medical records, contracts, correspondence, IDs and screenshots. PROVEAiBLE doesn’t just file them — it OCRs and reads them, then builds them into the case file alongside the conversation.
A recommendation with a case-strength score, the key facts, a timeline, contradictions flagged across the documents, red flags, a plain-language client summary, and every redacted source document — one structured file your practitioner opens.
No. It reads the uploaded documents too and cross-checks them against the conversation and against each other. That cross-check is how contradictions across the file are surfaced before the first meeting.
Document images are OCR’d to text first. Then names, IDs and reference numbers are replaced with role tags before the case-analysis model sees them, so the reasoning model never works from the client’s identity.
I’ll send you a private demo tuned to your practice — upload a document and watch the case file build. Or see the full product →
Free, no card, no call.
