Immigration clients are among the most linguistically diverse in any practice — and often in the most urgent situations: visa expiry, deportation proceedings, family separation. A form in English loses the details. Waiting for an interpreter delays everything.
And the wrong intake — missed facts, misunderstood urgency — can cost a client their case. The client tells their story in their own language; your attorney receives a structured English case file, ready for the first appointment.
The conversation happens in the client’s language. What lands in your inbox is in English, structured and ready.
They open the intake on your website and describe their situation in their own language — on the site you already run, at any hour.
The full conversation runs in that language — asking about visa status, dates, family members and urgency factors, the way a careful intake interview would.
Before any AI processing, personal identifiers are removed server-side — the model never sees identifying information.
Your attorney receives the facts, timeline, parties, urgency flags and missing documentation — structured and ready for the first appointment.
Not a generic translation list — the languages an immigration practice meets at first contact, each shown in its own script.
Every intake arrives in the same shape, scannable before the first appointment.
The situation, visa category, key dates and what the client is seeking — the shape of the matter, at a glance.
Family members, sponsors, employers and opposing parties — who is involved and how they relate.
Visa expiry dates, court dates, removal orders and deadlines — surfaced up top, so nothing time-sensitive slips.
What exists, what’s missing and what needs to be obtained — so the first appointment starts with a plan.
Confidentiality matters more in immigration than in almost any practice area — so it’s built into the architecture, not bolted on.
Client data is stripped of personal identifiers before any AI sees it. The product runs on your organisation’s own AI key — your data stays yours, governed by your provider’s terms — and intake data is processed transiently with zero retention on our servers after delivery.
Recent court rulings have found that uploading client data to public AI tools can waive privilege, and the confidentiality duty under ABA Model Rule 1.6 applies regardless of the technology. That’s the whole point of stripping identifiers before any model sees the data — the questions any attorney should be asking of any AI intake tool. See exactly how the redaction works → · Full architecture and jurisdiction notes →
Nothing to install. Sits on your existing website. Case files deliver to your existing inbox.
Request a demo